← Evidence libraryBartels cubital tunnel RCT
Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1.
Bartels RH, Verhagen WI, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Neurosurgery 2005 · PMID 15730578 · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000154131.01167.03
Randomised trialManagementPeripheral nerveCitation checked
- Question
- Is anterior subcutaneous transposition better than simple in situ decompression for idiopathic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow?
- Design
- Prospective randomised controlled trial at a single Dutch referral centre with 1-year follow-up.
- Patients
- Adults with idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome (ulnar neuropathy at the elbow).
- Intervention
- Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve
- Comparison
- Simple decompression in situ
- Primary outcome
- Clinical outcome (excellent/good versus fair/poor) at 1 year
- Key result
- Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the two operations, but complications were significantly more frequent after transposition.
- Limitations
- Single-centre trial of modest size with only 1-year follow-up; outcome rating was not blinded to the procedure.
- Impact on practice
- Supports simple in situ decompression as the first-line operation for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome, as it is simpler and safer; the authors favoured it even when the nerve subluxed.