← Evidence library

Clinical tests for ACL rupture meta-analysis

Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.

Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2006 · PMID 16715828 · doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2011

Systematic review / meta-analysisDiagnosisKnee soft tissue & sportsCitation checked
Question
How accurate are the Lachman, anterior drawer and pivot shift tests for diagnosing ACL rupture?
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Patients
Patients with suspected ACL rupture examined clinically, with arthroscopy, MRI or arthrometry as reference standard.
Intervention
Lachman test, anterior drawer test and pivot shift test
Comparison
Reference-standard confirmation of ACL rupture
Primary outcome
Pooled sensitivity and specificity of each test
Key result
The Lachman test had the best overall sensitivity for ACL rupture, while the pivot shift test was highly specific and useful for ruling the diagnosis in. The anterior drawer test performed better in chronic than acute injuries.
Limitations
Included studies were heterogeneous in quality, setting and examiner experience; anaesthesia status varied across studies.
Impact on practice
Supports Lachman as the key screening test for ACL injury and pivot shift as a confirmatory test, a commonly examined point in UK assessments.
Practise 17 questions on this paper →Read the paper ↗