← Evidence libraryCochrane patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation.
Smith TO, Donell S, Song F, et al. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015 · PMID 25716704 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008106.pub3
Systematic review / meta-analysisManagementKnee soft tissue & sportsCitation checked
- Question
- In people with primary or recurrent lateral patellar dislocation, does surgery give better outcomes than non-surgical management?
- Design
- Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised trials.
- Patients
- Adolescents and adults with a first-time (primary) lateral patellar dislocation.
- Intervention
- Surgical stabilisation (various soft-tissue and realignment procedures)
- Comparison
- Non-surgical management (bracing, physiotherapy)
- Primary outcome
- Recurrent dislocation and patient-reported knee function
- Key result
- Surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrent dislocation, but the evidence was of low or very low quality and any difference in patient-reported function was uncertain.
- Limitations
- Small, heterogeneous, mostly older trials using a variety of procedures rarely including modern MPFL reconstruction; low-quality evidence.
- Impact on practice
- Most first-time dislocations without osteochondral fracture are still managed non-operatively, with stabilisation (typically MPFL reconstruction with or without bony realignment) considered for recurrent instability.