← Evidence library

FISH

Effect of Surgery vs Functional Bracing on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures: The FISH Randomized Clinical Trial

Rämö L, Sumrein BO, Lepola V, et al. JAMA 2020 · PMID 32396179 · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3182

Randomised trialManagementUpper limb traumaCitation checked
Question
In adults with closed displaced humeral shaft fractures, does surgical fixation give better function than functional bracing?
Design
RCT in two university hospital trauma centres in Finland.
Patients
Adults with a closed, unilateral, displaced humeral shaft fracture, excluding multiple trauma and multimorbidity.
Intervention
Open reduction and plate fixation
Comparison
Functional bracing
Primary outcome
DASH score at 12 months
Key result
There was no clinically important difference in DASH at 12 months; bracing had a higher non-union rate, with some patients later converted to surgery.
Limitations
Small sample from two centres and not blinded; patients with multiple injuries were excluded.
Impact on practice
Supports functional bracing as first-line treatment for most isolated humeral shaft fractures, while counselling patients about the risk of non-union and delayed surgery.
Practise 6 questions on this paper →Read the paper ↗