← Evidence libraryHIP ATTACK
Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial.
HIP ATTACK Investigators. Lancet (London, England) 2020 · PMID 32050090 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30058-1
Randomised trialManagementLower limb traumaCitation checked
- Question
- Does accelerated surgery within hours of diagnosis reduce mortality and major complications compared with standard timing in hip fracture?
- Design
- International multicentre RCT across many countries.
- Patients
- Adults aged 45 or over with a hip fracture requiring surgery.
- Intervention
- Accelerated surgery (target within 6 hours of diagnosis)
- Comparison
- Standard care timing
- Primary outcome
- Co-primary outcomes of mortality and major perioperative complications at 90 days
- Key result
- Accelerated surgery did not significantly reduce either mortality or the composite of major complications at 90 days. Some secondary outcomes, such as delirium and time to mobilisation, favoured accelerated surgery.
- Limitations
- Standard care in many participating sites was already relatively fast, and it was not possible to blind patients or clinicians.
- Impact on practice
- Supports the UK standard of surgery on the day of or day after admission rather than ultra-early surgery, while confirming that unnecessary delay should still be avoided.