← Evidence librarySurgery vs non-surgical therapy for CTS (Jarvik)
Surgery versus non-surgical therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomised parallel-group trial
Jarvik JG, Comstock BA, Kliot M, et al. Lancet (London, England) 2009 · PMID 19782873 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61517-8
Randomised trialManagementHandCitation checked
- Question
- In carpal tunnel syndrome without denervation, does surgical release give better outcomes than multimodal non-surgical treatment?
- Design
- Multicentre parallel-group RCT across academic and private practice centres in the USA, with blinded outcome assessment.
- Patients
- Adults with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome without thenar denervation.
- Intervention
- Open or endoscopic carpal tunnel release
- Comparison
- Structured non-surgical treatment (hand therapy and ultrasound)
- Primary outcome
- Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment questionnaire (CTSAQ) function score at 12 months
- Key result
- Surgery gave significantly greater improvement in function and symptoms at 12 months, although both groups improved and the size of the difference was modest.
- Limitations
- Not all patients allocated to surgery had it; the non-surgical arm did not include steroid injection; patients could not be blinded to treatment.
- Impact on practice
- Supports offering carpal tunnel release to patients with confirmed CTS whose symptoms are significant, rather than prolonged conservative care.