← Evidence library

Surgery vs non-surgical therapy for CTS (Jarvik)

Surgery versus non-surgical therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomised parallel-group trial

Jarvik JG, Comstock BA, Kliot M, et al. Lancet (London, England) 2009 · PMID 19782873 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61517-8

Randomised trialManagementHandCitation checked
Question
In carpal tunnel syndrome without denervation, does surgical release give better outcomes than multimodal non-surgical treatment?
Design
Multicentre parallel-group RCT across academic and private practice centres in the USA, with blinded outcome assessment.
Patients
Adults with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome without thenar denervation.
Intervention
Open or endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Comparison
Structured non-surgical treatment (hand therapy and ultrasound)
Primary outcome
Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment questionnaire (CTSAQ) function score at 12 months
Key result
Surgery gave significantly greater improvement in function and symptoms at 12 months, although both groups improved and the size of the difference was modest.
Limitations
Not all patients allocated to surgery had it; the non-surgical arm did not include steroid injection; patients could not be blinded to treatment.
Impact on practice
Supports offering carpal tunnel release to patients with confirmed CTS whose symptoms are significant, rather than prolonged conservative care.
Read the paper ↗