← Evidence library

NERVES

Surgical microdiscectomy versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc (NERVES): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

Wilby MJ, Best A, Wood E, et al. The Lancet. Rheumatology 2021 · PMID 33969319 · doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00036-9

Randomised trialManagementSpineCitation checked
Question
For sciatica from lumbar disc herniation, is transforaminal epidural steroid injection as effective as microdiscectomy as first-line invasive treatment?
Design
NIHR-funded pragmatic multicentre open-label phase 3 RCT with economic evaluation in 11 UK spinal units.
Patients
Adults aged 16-65 with MRI-confirmed, non-emergency sciatica from lumbar disc herniation of 6 weeks to 12 months duration, not responding to non-invasive care.
Intervention
Transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Comparison
Surgical microdiscectomy
Primary outcome
Oswestry Disability Index at 18 weeks
Key result
Disability at 18 weeks did not differ significantly between injection and microdiscectomy, and injection was the cheaper first-line option on economic evaluation.
Limitations
Open-label, only a small fraction of screened patients were enrolled, and primary outcome data were missing for a proportion of each arm.
Impact on practice
Supports offering transforaminal epidural injection before microdiscectomy in the NHS sciatica pathway for patients without red flags.
Practise 107 questions on this paper →Read the paper ↗