← Evidence libraryNERVES
Surgical microdiscectomy versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc (NERVES): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
Wilby MJ, Best A, Wood E, et al. The Lancet. Rheumatology 2021 · PMID 33969319 · doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00036-9
Randomised trialManagementSpineCitation checked
- Question
- For sciatica from lumbar disc herniation, is transforaminal epidural steroid injection as effective as microdiscectomy as first-line invasive treatment?
- Design
- NIHR-funded pragmatic multicentre open-label phase 3 RCT with economic evaluation in 11 UK spinal units.
- Patients
- Adults aged 16-65 with MRI-confirmed, non-emergency sciatica from lumbar disc herniation of 6 weeks to 12 months duration, not responding to non-invasive care.
- Intervention
- Transforaminal epidural steroid injection
- Comparison
- Surgical microdiscectomy
- Primary outcome
- Oswestry Disability Index at 18 weeks
- Key result
- Disability at 18 weeks did not differ significantly between injection and microdiscectomy, and injection was the cheaper first-line option on economic evaluation.
- Limitations
- Open-label, only a small fraction of screened patients were enrolled, and primary outcome data were missing for a proportion of each arm.
- Impact on practice
- Supports offering transforaminal epidural injection before microdiscectomy in the NHS sciatica pathway for patients without red flags.