← Evidence libraryOttawa knee rule validation
Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries.
Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. JAMA 1996 · PMID 8594242 · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530320035031
Cohort studyDiagnosisKnee soft tissue & sportsCitation checked
- Question
- Does the Ottawa knee rule safely identify adults with acute knee injury who need radiographs to exclude fracture?
- Design
- Prospective validation study in the emergency departments of two Canadian university hospitals.
- Patients
- Adults presenting to emergency departments with acute knee injury.
- Intervention
- Application of the Ottawa knee rule (age 55 or over, isolated patellar tenderness, fibular head tenderness, inability to flex to 90 degrees, inability to weight bear four steps)
- Comparison
- Radiography or follow-up as reference standard for clinically important fracture
- Primary outcome
- Sensitivity of the rule for clinically important knee fracture
- Key result
- The rule identified all clinically important fractures in the validation cohort (sensitivity of 100%) and would have reduced the need for knee radiographs substantially.
- Limitations
- Specificity is modest, and it was derived and validated in adults, so applicability to young children is limited.
- Impact on practice
- Standard decision tool in UK emergency departments to decide which acute knee injuries need an X-ray.