← Evidence library

Ottawa knee rule validation

Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries.

Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. JAMA 1996 · PMID 8594242 · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530320035031

Cohort studyDiagnosisKnee soft tissue & sportsCitation checked
Question
Does the Ottawa knee rule safely identify adults with acute knee injury who need radiographs to exclude fracture?
Design
Prospective validation study in the emergency departments of two Canadian university hospitals.
Patients
Adults presenting to emergency departments with acute knee injury.
Intervention
Application of the Ottawa knee rule (age 55 or over, isolated patellar tenderness, fibular head tenderness, inability to flex to 90 degrees, inability to weight bear four steps)
Comparison
Radiography or follow-up as reference standard for clinically important fracture
Primary outcome
Sensitivity of the rule for clinically important knee fracture
Key result
The rule identified all clinically important fractures in the validation cohort (sensitivity of 100%) and would have reduced the need for knee radiographs substantially.
Limitations
Specificity is modest, and it was derived and validated in adults, so applicability to young children is limited.
Impact on practice
Standard decision tool in UK emergency departments to decide which acute knee injuries need an X-ray.
Practise 3 questions on this paper →Read the paper ↗