← Evidence libraryOxford Hip Score
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, et al. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 1996 · PMID 8666621
Cohort studyPrognosisResearch, statistics & guidelinesCitation checked
- Question
- Can a short patient-completed questionnaire validly and reliably measure outcome after total hip replacement?
- Design
- Prospective development and validation study of a 12-item questionnaire in patients undergoing hip replacement in Oxford.
- Patients
- Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement for arthritis.
- Intervention
- 12-item Oxford Hip Score (pain and function)
- Comparison
- Existing generic and clinician-based measures (e.g. SF-36, Charnley)
- Primary outcome
- Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the questionnaire
- Key result
- The 12-item questionnaire was reliable, correlated with established measures and was responsive to change after surgery, supporting its use as a joint-specific patient-reported outcome.
- Limitations
- Developed in a single centre; ceiling effects and the later change of scoring from 12-60 (worse) to 0-48 (better) cause confusion when comparing studies.
- Impact on practice
- The OHS is the hip PROM used in the national NHS PROMs programme and the NJR, and is the standard outcome in UK hip trials.