← Evidence libraryOxford Knee Score
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, et al. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 1998 · PMID 9460955 · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859
Cohort studyPrognosisResearch, statistics & guidelinesCitation checked
- Question
- Can a short patient-completed questionnaire validly and reliably measure outcome after total knee replacement?
- Design
- Prospective development and validation study of a 12-item questionnaire in patients undergoing knee replacement.
- Patients
- Patients undergoing total knee replacement for arthritis.
- Intervention
- 12-item Oxford Knee Score (pain and function)
- Comparison
- Existing generic and clinician-based measures
- Primary outcome
- Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the questionnaire
- Key result
- The questionnaire showed good internal consistency, reproducibility and validity, and was sensitive to change after knee replacement.
- Limitations
- Validated in a knee replacement population, so use in other knee conditions requires caution; scoring was later altered to 0-48.
- Impact on practice
- The OKS is the knee PROM collected nationally in NHS PROMs and the NJR, and is the default primary outcome in UK knee arthroplasty trials such as TOPKAT.