← Evidence libraryPeerbooms PRP vs steroid
Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up.
Peerbooms JC, Sluimer J, Bruijn DJ, et al. The American journal of sports medicine 2010 · PMID 20448192 · doi:10.1177/0363546509355445
Randomised trialManagementElbowCitation checked
- Question
- Is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection more effective than corticosteroid injection for chronic lateral epicondylitis?
- Design
- Double-blind RCT in two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands.
- Patients
- Adults with chronic lateral epicondylitis.
- Intervention
- Autologous platelet concentrate (PRP) injection
- Comparison
- Corticosteroid injection
- Primary outcome
- Treatment success (more than 25% reduction in VAS pain or DASH without reintervention) at 1 year
- Key result
- The PRP group had significantly more patients with successful pain and function outcomes at 1 year; the steroid group improved early and then declined.
- Limitations
- No placebo arm, so the comparison may reflect harm from steroid rather than benefit from PRP; modest sample.
- Impact on practice
- Frequently quoted in support of PRP, but should be read alongside placebo-controlled trials such as Krogh (2013), which did not show PRP beating saline.