← Evidence library

Peerbooms PRP vs steroid

Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up.

Peerbooms JC, Sluimer J, Bruijn DJ, et al. The American journal of sports medicine 2010 · PMID 20448192 · doi:10.1177/0363546509355445

Randomised trialManagementElbowCitation checked
Question
Is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection more effective than corticosteroid injection for chronic lateral epicondylitis?
Design
Double-blind RCT in two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands.
Patients
Adults with chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Intervention
Autologous platelet concentrate (PRP) injection
Comparison
Corticosteroid injection
Primary outcome
Treatment success (more than 25% reduction in VAS pain or DASH without reintervention) at 1 year
Key result
The PRP group had significantly more patients with successful pain and function outcomes at 1 year; the steroid group improved early and then declined.
Limitations
No placebo arm, so the comparison may reflect harm from steroid rather than benefit from PRP; modest sample.
Impact on practice
Frequently quoted in support of PRP, but should be read alongside placebo-controlled trials such as Krogh (2013), which did not show PRP beating saline.
Practise 1 question on this paper →Read the paper ↗