← Evidence libraryPeul sciatica trial (Sciatica Trial)
Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica
Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, et al. The New England journal of medicine 2007 · PMID 17538084 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa064039
Randomised trialManagementSpineCitation checked
- Question
- In sciatica from lumbar disc herniation lasting 6-12 weeks, does early microdiscectomy give better outcomes than prolonged conservative care with surgery only if needed?
- Design
- Multicentre RCT in Dutch hospitals.
- Patients
- Adults with severe radicular leg pain of 6-12 weeks' duration and an MRI-confirmed disc herniation matching the symptoms.
- Intervention
- Early microdiscectomy
- Comparison
- Prolonged conservative treatment, with surgery offered if symptoms persisted or worsened
- Primary outcome
- Roland Disability Questionnaire, leg pain VAS and global perceived recovery over 1 year
- Key result
- Early surgery produced faster relief of leg pain and faster perceived recovery, but by 1 year outcomes were similar between groups; a substantial proportion of the conservative group eventually had surgery.
- Limitations
- Crossover to surgery in the conservative arm and lack of blinding complicate interpretation; patients with cauda equina or severe motor deficit were excluded.
- Impact on practice
- Supports shared decision-making: surgery buys quicker recovery rather than a better long-term result, so either early surgery or a further period of conservative care is reasonable.