← Evidence library

Plint removable splint vs cast

A randomized, controlled trial of removable splinting versus casting for wrist buckle fractures in children.

Plint AC, Perry JJ, Correll R, et al. Pediatrics 2006 · PMID 16510648 · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0801

Randomised trialManagementFracture clinic & non-operative careCitation checked
Question
Does a removable wrist splint give better function than a cast for children with distal radius buckle fractures?
Design
Single-centre randomised controlled trial in a Canadian paediatric emergency department.
Patients
Children aged 6 to 15 years with buckle fractures of the distal radius and/or ulna.
Intervention
Removable prefabricated wrist splint
Comparison
Short arm cast for 3 weeks
Primary outcome
Physical functioning on the Activities Scale for Kids (performance) at 14 days
Key result
Splinted children had better physical function at 2 weeks and less difficulty with daily activities such as bathing than those in casts, with similar pain and no refractures in either group.
Limitations
Single-centre trial with a modest sample and notable loss to analysis; outcomes were self-reported by unblinded families.
Impact on practice
Early evidence underpinning the move away from casting buckle fractures towards removable splints, later reflected in NICE NG38 and extended by FORCE.
Practise 6 questions on this paper →Read the paper ↗