← Evidence libraryPlint removable splint vs cast
A randomized, controlled trial of removable splinting versus casting for wrist buckle fractures in children.
Plint AC, Perry JJ, Correll R, et al. Pediatrics 2006 · PMID 16510648 · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0801
Randomised trialManagementFracture clinic & non-operative careCitation checked
- Question
- Does a removable wrist splint give better function than a cast for children with distal radius buckle fractures?
- Design
- Single-centre randomised controlled trial in a Canadian paediatric emergency department.
- Patients
- Children aged 6 to 15 years with buckle fractures of the distal radius and/or ulna.
- Intervention
- Removable prefabricated wrist splint
- Comparison
- Short arm cast for 3 weeks
- Primary outcome
- Physical functioning on the Activities Scale for Kids (performance) at 14 days
- Key result
- Splinted children had better physical function at 2 weeks and less difficulty with daily activities such as bathing than those in casts, with similar pain and no refractures in either group.
- Limitations
- Single-centre trial with a modest sample and notable loss to analysis; outcomes were self-reported by unblinded families.
- Impact on practice
- Early evidence underpinning the move away from casting buckle fractures towards removable splints, later reflected in NICE NG38 and extended by FORCE.