← Evidence librarySkou TKR vs non-surgical RCT
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement.
Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, et al. The New England journal of medicine 2015 · PMID 26488691 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1505467
Randomised trialManagementKnee arthroplastyCitation checked
- Question
- Does total knee replacement plus non-surgical treatment give better outcomes than non-surgical treatment alone in moderate to severe knee OA?
- Design
- Danish RCT with 12-month follow-up.
- Patients
- Patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis eligible for unilateral TKR.
- Intervention
- TKR followed by a 12-week structured non-surgical programme
- Comparison
- 12-week non-surgical programme alone (exercise, education, diet, insoles, analgesia)
- Primary outcome
- KOOS4 at 12 months
- Key result
- TKR plus non-surgical treatment produced significantly greater improvement in pain, function and quality of life at 12 months, but with more serious adverse events; most in the non-surgical group improved and many had not undergone TKR by 1 year.
- Limitations
- Unblinded with a modest sample size and short follow-up; crossover to surgery in the non-surgical arm.
- Impact on practice
- First RCT confirming TKR is more effective than structured non-operative care, while showing a structured programme is a reasonable first step for many patients.