← Evidence library

UKUFF

Effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (UKUFF): a randomised controlled trial.

Carr A, Cooper C, Campbell MK, et al. The bone & joint journal 2017 · PMID 28053265 · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.99b1.bjj-2016-0424.r1

Randomised trialManagementShoulderCitation checked
Question
Is arthroscopic rotator cuff repair more effective than open (or mini-open) repair?
Design
Pragmatic multicentre RCT across UK NHS hospitals with economic evaluation.
Patients
Adults aged 50 and over with a degenerative rotator cuff tear suitable for repair.
Intervention
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Comparison
Open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
Primary outcome
Oxford Shoulder Score at 2 years
Key result
There was no significant difference in Oxford Shoulder Score, re-tear rate or complications between arthroscopic and open repair.
Limitations
Many patients assessed intraoperatively had no or irreparable tears, and repair integrity imaging was available only in a subset.
Impact on practice
Showed that the surgical approach can be chosen on surgeon expertise and cost; arthroscopic repair carries no outcome advantage.
Practise 3 questions on this paper →Read the paper ↗